Data emerging on a daily basis from the United States and the United Kingdom has exposed what is an uncomfortable and unpalatable truth; that black and minority ethnic healthcare workers are dying from Covid-19 at an alarmingly higher rate than their white counterparts. And no one seems to know the reasons why? At the time of publishing this Blog, of the 12 doctors who had died in the UK after contracting the virus, all were non-white.

On this side of the 'Pond', after the head of the BMA, Dr. Chaand Nagpaul called for a review, our politicians have reacted by belatedly scrambling for answers; with both the Government and Her Majesty's official opposition announcing respective inquiries into the matter in short order.

The Press as always has not been backwards in coming forwards, with a number of seemingly plausible reasons for the disproportionality in mortality rates. Predictably, they mostly focus on traditional socio-economic and socio-behavioural memes such as obesity, the high rates of heart disease among BAME populations or that BAME families are more likely to be living in overcrowded, multi-generational households and so on. Few if any, touch on the 'elephant in the room' and what I believe to be the root cause for the differences we are seeing in mortality rates and that is quite simply 'Discrimination'.

Some may be familiar with the term 'Allostatic load'. Broadly speaking it refers to the 'wear and tear' on our psychology and physiology (our mind and our body) which accumulates over time as an individual is exposed to repeated or chronic stress. Several studies have shown that Black-White disparities in mortality persist, even after adjusting for socio-economic and socio-behavioural factors. One such study involving 4515 Black and White individuals between the ages of 35 and 64 concluded that allostatic load burden did indeed partially explain the higher mortality rate among black individuals in the US.

Work-related stress is widely recognised as a significant problem in the health service, with the HSE confirming that health & social care workers have some of the highest rates of self-reported illness due to stress, anxiety and depression. Add to this already difficult work environment, the additional stress factors which stem from repeated exposure to discriminatory behaviours within the NHS and you have in my view, the logical starting point for any public inquiry.

We all know that stress, specifically chronic stress is not only dangerous and potentially disease provoking, but is known to suppress immune function and increase susceptibility to viruses, infections and cancers by damaging the body's defences against disease. 

So what do we already know about the types of discriminatory treatment that BAME workers within the NHS are routinely exposed to which may induce chronic stress related symptoms? 

Well in 2008, Dr. Vivienne Lyfar-Cisse published the first ever Race Equality Review covering 27 NHS Trusts represented in the South East Coast region. The data revealed widespread disadvantages faced by BAME staff evidenced by the disproportionality in recruitment, bullying, grievances and disciplinary rates. Subsequent annual reviews have only served to re-validate those findings. The study showed that whilst BAME staff comprised 15% of the workforce, they were involved in more than half of the bullying and harassment cases in the region's mental health trusts, and in 25% of disciplinary cases across all the trusts surveyed. In terms of the employment penalties faced by BAME candidates, the data showed that BAME applicants accounted for 31% of those shortlisted but only 16% of final appointees. 

In 2019, an independent study commissioned by the General Medical Council and conducted by Dr. Doyin Atewologun, Roger Kline and Margaret Ochieng found that BAME doctors had double the rate of referrals to the GMC by their employers as compared to white doctors. Similarly, non-UK doctors were 2.5 times more likely to be referred by an employer to the GMC as compared to UK graduate doctors.

Another report commissioned by the Race Equality Foundation and conducted by Roger Kline in 2015 (Beyond the Snowy White Peaks of the NHS) found that whilst BAME people constituted 45% (after adjusting for illegal and undocumented migrants) of London's population and 41% of London's NHS workforce, white staff were 3 times more likely than BAME staff to hold senior management positions.

'The Freedom to Speak Up' report, also published in 2015 reported that BAME staff who had been brave enough to report concerns at work were:

  • More likely to be victimised by management than white staff raising concerns;
  • More likely to be ignored than white staff raising concerns;
  • More likely to be victimised by co-workers for raising concerns;
  • Less likely to be praised than white staff by management for raising concerns; and
  • Less likely to raise concerns again having done so once, than white staff were.
Whilst we wait with keen anticipation for the conclusions of both the Government and the Labour inquiries, I want to strike a note of caution. Any report that fails to address the link between Covid-19 mortality and allostatic load burden differences between BAME and White NHS workers and the reasons for any differential, is in my view not only a sham report but a real missed opportunity to finally tackle the scourge of racial discrimination in the workplace.


About the author

Glanville Williams is an EDI Specialist and the Founder of InclusionQuery.


Comments